An essay always under revision for me. I was reading too much Joan Didion at the time (first draft in 2012) and it certainly shows. My first draft contained an absurdly pretentious pose--I plopped in the entire Shakespeare sonnet without explication of any kind: figure it out! I must have thought. I hope this version is more humble.
We
were at one time a singular being. This is a curious feeling.
We
were born on the same day in March of 1990. About nine months earlier, for a certain period of time, were
were a single individual. Did we itch to be two? As monozygotic
twins—identical twins—we come from one egg, one strand of DNA. What possible combination of cosmic
motivations, global environmental factors, genetic susceptibilities,
evolutionary hiccups, astrological alignments, and regional weather
conditions could transform one person into two people? More simply
put: what split the egg? To counter a common question put to
me—usually unthinkingly—What is it like being a twin? I will
often play the cynic: I don't know, what is it like not to be a twin?
This is both coyly humorous and strategically avoidant. But after
all, what a stupid question. Nevertheless, I will deign: What is it
like to be a twin? In truth, it’s wonderful.
*
My
sister and I are walking up the hill to campus for final exams. We
are arguing about music, bickering and bantering in our own
shorthand, and I wonder if I could ever do the same with a romantic
partner. I have showered and been up since seven, I dress in an
affected manner, deliberately (ashamedly) academic; she has rolled
out of bed and thrown on a hooded sweater. I am headed to an English
Lit. exam, she is headed to History of Rock and Roll. Our argument is
preposterous: The Ramones vs. Glenn Gould. I am saying things like,
“What did the Ramones do for music? They knew three guitar chords,”
and she cannot believe we are related. Even I realize I am full of
it, but I enjoy (as does she) the back and forth.
For
as long as I can remember, my very identity has itself been a
conversation piece, a nice icebreaker if you will. Hello
have you met Laura? Did you know she’s a twin? Identical. They look
exactly alike. A
lazy but accurate skeleton of the conversation I will have with a
previously unacquainted stranger for possibly at least the next ten
minutes. Topics we are likely to cover:
-Do
you fight a lot?
-Do
you share boyfriends?
-What
are the key differences in appearance as well as personality?
-Who
is Baby A?
-What’s
it like?
-Did
you ever switch?
-Has
your being defined as ‘one of two’ ever resulted in a sort of
anxiety-ridden identity crisis?
I
was only asked the latter once by a psychology major deeply
interested in Jungian archetypes. I think I answered yes.
I
remember being struck by the story of Castor and Pollux, the twin
brothers of Helen of Troy (they are often conflated under one label,
the
Dioscuri, the
sons of Zeus.
One
wonders whether they—if any Castor and Pollux ever existed—would
have felt their individuality erased by such a label, or whether they
would have cared at all. Or perhaps the common name would have been a
comfort). Whether they were born out of one egg or two varies;
regardless, the two are never depicted without the other. The two
fought in battle together until Castor, fatally wounded, called out
to his brother. All-powerful Zeus offered Pollux either a full ticket to Olympus, or merely half time, sharing his
immortality with his brother. Pollux chose the latter; the brothers
split their time between Hades and heaven. I do not imagine the
choice was much of a choice at all for Pollux.
Imagine
if you will having someone around, with whom you may always converse
and bicker and banter and yet never tire. Imagine having the
privilege of claiming: I am a solitary person, I require space and
quiet and myself alone with my thoughts, and yet always knowing to the
very pith of your being that you are not, and have never really ever
been, alone in the world.
*
She
is, once again, telling me about the greatness of The Beatles. The
record player makes its revolutions in the background, the diamond
needle moving against the miniscule ridges of a vinyl copy of Rubber
Soul. We
take turns flipping the finished record over, not bothering to put on
something new. Her animated face will never grow old, not like this,
not when expressing her admiration for Lennon-McCartney. Prosaic
moments such as these are when the mind, relaxed and open, wanders
down paths without particular intention or chosen destination. I feel
the warmth of this moment, the darkness of the winter evening outside
exaggerated by the bronzed light within the room. We will live like
this forever.
We
are permeable beings, porous, full of holes at the microscopic
level. What is it, exactly, that separates one person from another?
We have never been far apart, always like Castor and Pollux, in
relation to the other. I am never really alone. This is a comfort.
But while you are half of a whole, created and formed in the same
moments, there is unfortunately no precise way to determine who will
die first.
I
think of a Shakespeare sonnet, number sixty-four. When
I have seen by Time’s fell hand defaced / The rich proud cost of
outworn buried age…loss,
death is inevitable. I worry too often, the thought creeps up in the
places I am most comfortable, unreasonable scenarios. I wonder who
would cope better, which survivor? When
I have seen such interchange of state, / Or state itself confounded
to decay:
the worst scenario. Norman Rush calls it the “hellmouth,” the
“opening up of the mouth of hell right in from of you, without
warning, through no fault of your own.” Ruin
hath taught me thus to ruminate / That Time will come and take my
love away. Living
involves loss, but loss always shocks us. The injustice of it, the
utterly unwelcome, yet wholly predictable facts of life seem still
distant to me. I am young but already sense, abstract and foreboding,
a shortness of time.
Who
will die first?
Families,
people in love have the same thought, but I cannot help but wonder
whether the knowledge of a common origin, a onetime shared existence,
might increase the loss; or am I exaggerating my own tragedy?
Nevertheless, two possibilities: who will be left behind?
Since
I first conceived of her mortality I have never not been afraid.
No comments:
Post a Comment