Saturday, December 15, 2018

Please Be Useful: Draft and Ideas so Far

I began in literature. You get into literature because this is where the big questions are solved. This is where life and death are treated with attention, beauty, dignity, bravery. Mortality is faced in the pages of Tolstoy. Self-knowledge and love found in George Eliot and Jane Austen. Humanity and second chances in Dickens. Vanities wrested away to be mirrored to you in the unfathomable depths of Melville. Quiet fires in Brontë, political machinations in Trollope; it would all be found in literature. This was my Real. Four years of college, and then a surprise acceptance into Rice University’s Phd program: I’d already made it.  


And then one summer my mother needed me: she was home alone, in pain, and I was thirty minutes away. I had spent a rare night in town after drinking with friends. I had just woken up in the afternoon and everyone else was at work. I didn’t call an ambulance because she wasn’t dying, but this was the first time I ever saw my mother crippled by something, and I just didn’t understand. She had recently undergone pelvic mesh surgery, and days later--slow days of apparent progress--intense waves of pain suddenly brought her back down.


What was I to do? This wasn’t in Dickens.


I drove to her as fast as I dared, helped her into my dusty Ford Escape, and drove another thirty minutes to the local hospital where she worked as an RN in Radiology. She was withdrawn and pale, but per her instructions we visited the internal medicine doctor instead of beelining for the ER. I was useless. Waiting and waiting and being wheeled here and there and finally to the radiology waiting room for an outpatient scan. She was pale, cold, weak, and shivering in pain. It was awful. Waiting. I felt completely out of my depth. I remember the absurdity of attempting to maneuver her wheelchair into a registration room--eyes tight with pain, body wracked over itself. We were going to answer questions they already had answers to. But all I knew to do was fall in line. I knew no shortcuts, or inside tracks. I could not advocate because I had no knowledge.


Mom saved herself, barely able to operate her own cell phone, but managing somehow to call her coworker. I just remember her saying “Come get me.” It was the same plea that got me to pick her up, and yet I had made no difference in her pain. But now help came. He swooped in, made eye contact with me and I saw myself, impotent and perhaps a bit in the way. Brian pulled her from registration (“You can take care of this, can’t you?”) and off they went. I stayed in the little room to confirm her birthday, her insurance, her address, her emergency contact. The little banalities you don’t care about when you’re on the patient side of medicine.


Somehow later I was standing over my mother who already looked better. Warm blankets piled over her form, now blessedly allowed to lay down in some patient prep room. They had made room for her because they could. Why hadn’t I asked for a warm blanket forty minutes ago? Why hadn’t I tried to track down her coworkers? Why hadn’t I taken care of my own mother?


She was seemingly swept to the CT table, the whole team working as a team. On 3, 1 2 3, and everybody moves with purpose because everybody had a job to do. Had I ever walked like that in my life? I noticed things I never had before. I remember crying like a child during the scan. My mother wasn’t dying, but she was in pain and I had done nothing about it. CT images appeared but I didn’t know what they meant. These tears were for my mother, but they were also for my own impotence.


Three years later I am standing in the same CT room as that day, but I’m wearing scrubs. It’s a stroke protocol and while the patient is being moved from the EMS cot to the CT table, I take a blood sugar just before the technologist begins the scan. This patient has been in the ER less than ten minutes and diagnostic imaging may be leading them down a road of definitive care. I get to watch the images flash on the screen. Perhaps today we see something glaring. I have a slightly more confident gait. I now sometimes move with purpose, even if only to crouch down to explain to a patient who I am and what my interaction with them will be that day. Sometimes they are in tears of pain, sometimes they are impatient and annoyed, sometimes confused, often a little scared.



Thursday, February 22, 2018

Messing about with Neruda

So I love this Neruda sonnet (XVII):

I do not love you as if you were salt-rose, or topaz,
or the arrow of carnations the fire shoots off.
I love you as certain dark things are to be loved,
in secret, between the shadow and the soul.

I love you as the plant that never blooms
but carries in itself the light of hidden flowers;
thanks to your love a certain solid fragrance,
risen from the earth, lives darkly in my body.

I love you without knowing how, or when, or from where.
I love you straightforwardly, without complexities or pride;
so I love you because I know no other way

than this: where I does not exist, nor you,
so close that your hand on my chest is my hand,
so close that your eyes close as I fall asleep.

 I was sitting with a patient at work who was sleeping, so I had a pen and paper nearby--this little piece of foolery came out:

Neruda told me he did not love me.
But then said he did love me but like a plant in the dark. And also that it was a secret, and we weren’t going to talk about it. 
But I think he also said I smelt good, all of which felt weird. 
But everybody shivered unconsciously and with obvious pleasure, so there are worse things, I guess, than being loved like a ficus in an ill-lit room.

(12/8/17)

Reading in 2017

Reading- and Writing-wise I slowed down in 2017 because it was a year of shifting foci.

1/1 In Chancery, John Galsworthy (1920)
1/10 American Philosophy: A Love Story, John Kaag (2016)
1/30 A Jane Austen Education, William Deresiewicz (2011)
3/29 To Let, John Galsworthy (1921)
4/1 Bartleby the Scrivner, Herman Melville (1853)
4/15 Rustication, Charles Palliser (2004)
5/18 Harry Potter and Sorcerer's Stone, J.K. Rowling [reread] (1997)
5/20 Alpha Docs: The Making of a Cardiologist, Daniel Munoz (2015)
5/21 HP and the Chamber of Secrets, Rowling [reread] (1998)
5/29 Fathers and Sons, Ivan Turgenev (1862)
6/1 HP and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Rowline [reread] (1999)
8/17 HP and the Goblet of Fire, Rowling [reread] (2000)
8/28 The Children Act, Ian McEwan (2014)
9/3 Goodbye, Mr. Chips, James Hilton (1934)
10/2 The Goldfinch, Donna Tartt (2013)
10/22 The Invention of Love, Tom Stoppard (1997)
10/24 Doubt: A Parable, John Patrick Shanley (2004)
12/20 Last Bus to Woodstock, Colin Dexter (1975)


My EMT course had began in January; I was certified in June. I took a cardiology course that summer (thus the surprisingly enjoyable Munoz memoir). I also had ridealongs July-August before taking a fantastic vacation to Colorado with my pops and sister. I was employed as an Emergency Department Tech in October on night shift--still adjusting to the sleep patterns. A good year, but hoping for even better productivity and career insight for 2018. I also had a pretty good workout routine in 2017 which needs to be reestablished. Entering a serious relationship has given me new priorities as well. Is this what "adulting" means? Having more fun now than I was at 20 in some ways, even with less alcohol and social life. Things feel richer.

I'll end this update post with a quote from The Forsyte Saga, about a character whose personal philosophy had been "To be kind and keep your end up--there's nothing else in it" (Galsworthy 801). After Young Jolyon's death, his son Jon reflects on Jolyon's legacy: his life, his work as a painter, the loves he left behind:

Jon came to have a curiously increased respect for his father [Jolyon]. The quiet tenacity with which he had converted a mediocre talent into something really individual was disclosed by these researches. There was a great mass of work with a rare continuity of growth in depth and reach of vision. Nothing certainly went very deep, or reached very high--but such as the work was, it was thorough, conscientious, and complete. And, remembering his father's utter absence of 'sides or self-assertion, the chaffing humility with which he had always spoken of this own efforts, ever calling himself 'an amateur,' Jon could not help feeling he had never really known his father. To take himself seriously, yet never bore others by letting them know that he did so, seemed to have been his ruling principle. (Galsworthy, Oxford 812-813)
I suppose my only misstep here is to let others know through this blog that I do try to take myself seriously. But--thank goodness--not too many besides myself actually review these entries. Keep it close.

Friday, January 6, 2017

What did I read (and finish and record) in 2016?

Jan 5.  The Nearest Thing to Life, James Wood.
Jan 9.  Purity, Jonathan Franzen
Jan 14. A Thousand Naked Strangers, Kevin Hazzard
Jan 25. The Taming of a Shrew, Shakespeare
Feb. 2 Titus Andronicus, Shakespeare
Feb. 15 A Midsummer Night's Dream, Shakespeare
Mar. 6  The Concrete Blonde, Michael Connelly
June 3 The Twenty-Seventh City, Jonathan Franzen
June 20 The Death of Ivan Ilyich, Leo Tolstoy
June 26 Euphoria, Lily King
June 26 The Flick, Annie Baker
July 8 Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Tom Stoppard
July 10 The Real Thing, Tom Stoppard
Sept 3 The Quincunx, Charles Palliser (781 dense pages)
Oct 11 The Man of Property, vol 1 Forsyte Sage, John Galsworthy
Oct 28 Silas Marner, George Eliot
Nov 2 The Testament of Mary, Colm Toibin

Tenui musam metitamur avena

Or, "We cultivate literature on a little oatmeal." Ref. in Richardson's biography of William James, p.59. Coined by Sydney Smith, a founding editor of The Edinburgh Review. 

From Richardson:

"Smith was an ardent believer in the association of ideas, in the notion, first given its full form by David Hartley, that "complex mental phenomena are formed from simple elements derived ultimately from sensation." The belief that everything mental has a physical explanation and origin--one of the rocks on which positivism is built--is put forward by Smith by way of an attack on metaphysics, " word of dire sound and horrible import," says Smith. "A great philosopher," he says, "may sit in his study and deny the existence of matter: but if he takes a walk in the street he must take care to leave his theory behind him."

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Notes on Nietzsche

Just re-reading my old notes on Nietzsche.



Tuesday October 7th, 2014
My Presentation on "On Truth hand Lying in a Non Moral Sense"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--Revaluation of all values
--Philosophy with a hammer. A tuning fork. Sounding out what doesn't ring true.
---Use Epigrams from Twilight of the Idols
15: "Posthumous human beings--like me, for example--are understood worse than timely ones, but they are listened to better. More accurately: we are never understood--and that's the source of our authority…
26: I distrust all systematizers and stay out of their way. The will to  a system is a lack of integrity.
Did he read Whitman? Or viceversa: "Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes."
----"Judgements, value judgments about life, for or against, can in the final analysis never be true they have value only as symptoms….the value of life cannot be assessed.
Idol #1: SOCRATES: Poor Socrates. Nietzsche thinks he's absolute shit! Nietzsche has a taste for the preSocratics as we noticed last reading. Greek philosophy before Socrates didn't infect it with his dialectics ie an investigation of truths in philosophy etc. by systematic reasoning.
"Socrates was the clown who got people to take him seriously: what really happened there?--" aka WTF Socrates?! (Twilight, 14)
Read about Socrates Section 11 and 12
"Reason" in language: oh, what a tricky old woman she is! I'm afraid we're not rid of God because we still believe in grammar…  (Twilight 21)
On Truth and Lying in a Non Moral Sense
--a touchstone for 20th century Deconstruction/Poststructuralism. Really for anyone ever who wondered if language and reality don't quite line up. Always a bit of ambiguity.
--Perhaps this is philosophical skepticism (Kant or Descartes. But even earlier pre Socratics like Pyrrho and Eastern philosophy.
--Truth as a comfortable lie.
--We the "clever animals [who] invented cognition"
--Human on earth "the most arrogant and most mendacious minute in the 'history of the world;"
-There have been ETERNITIES where the human intellect did not exist! Actually quite a humble philosophy. PULL DOWN THY VANITY via Pound
--The ideological target of this essay: the western commitment to seek fixed and solid truths. We are always under the influence of our own subjectivity, "truth" as such can never be found.
--"…[T]he intellect is human, and only its own possessor and progenitor regards it with such pathos, as if it housed the axis around which the entire world revolved." (874)
--illusion  as dream influences Freud (875)
--We only like pretty truth, pleasant truth
You want the truth?! You can't HANDle the truth!! We're not ready to let go of illusions. Truth could be painful. "If they will not content themselves with truth in the form of tautology, i.e. with empty husks, they will for ever exhange illusions for truth."
--"Is language the full and adequate expression of all realities?"
--Pure truth/"the thing in itself" is both impossible for language to grasp, but also undesirable. You don't even know you don't want it.
--Concepts are made by dropping what is individual and real. Plato's forms one of the earliest concepts in western philosophy.
"Like form, a concept is produced by overlooking what is individual and real, whereas nature knows neither forms nor concepts and hence no species, but only an 'x' which is inaccesible to us and indefinable by us." (878)
Emerson's influence on Nietzsche: "All I know is reception; I am and I have: but I do not get, and when I have fancied I had gotten anything, I found I did not."
Philosophy as a calling forth to find out who this thing you call yourself really is.


I think I have always found Nietzsche fun to read, as do many intelligent people (I think Kaufmann said this). You get that picture of the 15 year old with bad skin and no friends who reads Nietzsche for the first time and is like: Yes! Everything is stupid, and I have realized it and am now going to be cool and ironic about everything. I see the void now, no one else is authentically living. He’s been labeled a nihilist by people who haven’t read him. The great thing about his author’s not in Birth of Tragedy is that he realizes his own folly, as a kind of juvenile philosopher. It’s early work. He was too broody! That he learned to laugh in his later work is what is fun to read. I was thinking about your question Tim, would you rather be a nihilist or a hypocrite. Now my reading--you can correct all of this in just a sec if I’ve bungled it all--but my sense isn’t nihilism at all, or anyway it must be a qualified nihilism. Why did he hate Christianity. Because Christians are nihilists. Christians have seen this world and given up on it. They see it fallen and evil, and dismiss it for the real world to come. They don’t trust the senses anymore. The senses are all fallen, all subject to the devil in a way. They’ve lost human will. This is what he calls nihilism. He’s a hypocrite, but he revels in being a hypocrite because he can’t not be, and so to admit being a hypocrite is in some convoluted way to get out of it if only for a second or two. The will to a system is a lack of integrity. Nietzsche contradicts himself. I think a great way to understand his affinity for Emerson. Emerson understood that the Self is under constant, neverending revision. That the books you love today will not be the books you love tomorrow. That what you say today will be different tomorrow and this is what it means to philosophize. To try to find out what is the thing you call yourself. Philosophy with a tuning fork--sound out the discord.

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Interview #1

I wrote this little piece after graduating college in 2013. Obviously I was frustrated with the idea that I would need "practical skills." I now find myself standing a bit more in line with the interviewer voice, rather than the interviewee. Funny how we change. I still like that idealism though.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




-- Hello. I would like to apply for a position.

-- You have a degree.

-- I have a degree.

-- Give me applicable skills: _________________

-- Certainly. In spades: Exploring the human condition as expressed through language: the written word.

Better: Identifying and articulating underlying philosophical assumptions in a piece of writing. Deconstruction ala Derrida. Ala Nietzsche.

-- No no no. I mean concrete/practical/applicable/useable skills. I mean give me something identifiable.

Useful. Tell me the life skills you have acquired though your education. You have a degree. Where are the internships. Where is the networking. Give me networking. Give me names give me places.

-- I have a thesis.

-- You have a thesis.

-- I read and researched and wrote. And so I have a clever title and a passionately argued central vision.

-- Thesis schmeesis.

-- An original piece of research on the power of imaginative sympathy in modern environmentalism. I pushed these ideas until 3 am even. I worked very hard. There is a brilliant turn on page 14.

-- Who read the thesis? Who will ever read the thesis. Did anyone read the thesis.

-- . . .

-- No one read the thesis. The thesis does not matter. Give me applicable skills:________________

-- . . .

-- Can you work a copy machine?

-- I graduated with Honors. I have an even better than solid GPA.

-- Are you comfortable on a Mac or PC? Are you at home in Microsoft Office more specifically can you format spreadsheets in Microsoft Excel?

-- . . .

-- Wake up. Head out of the clouds. Come on down. What was your education for?

-- To ask questions.

-- Question: Can you give me applicable skills?:_______________

-- What does it mean to be human?

-- Can you come in on weekends? Are you willing to work the occasional Sunday?

-- Is there an objective reality outside of subjective perception, or is reality subjective perception itself?

-- Are you familiar with Prezi or are you more comfortable with Power Point.

-- And so can we live happy, purposeful lives even after dismissing free will? Do we have to dismiss free will?

-- Let us be honest.

-- I can do that.

-- No no no. Who are you kidding. Honestly. What is your plan. Where are you purposefully headed in the next five years. Where do you see yourself. Imaginatively speaking.

-- I will work hard.

-- You have debt. You have little experience and not very little debt. Write a thesis on how you will pay your debt.

-- I will pay my debt.

-- How.

-- I will get a job. I will use my skills.

-- Give me applicable skills:____________

-- . . .